Dugan & Associates, P.C.
No Recovery - No FeeFree Consultation
Serving all of Western Pennsylvania
Local: 412-353-3572 Toll Free: 888-9-9-D-U-G-A-N Toll Free: 888-9-9-D-U-G-A-N

NY court: worker's comp board ruling applies in personal injury case

Whenever there's an accident on a construction site, discovering exactly what happened and who is responsible can be a challenge. There are a lot of potentially hazardous things going on, often with numerous companies and their crews on site -- contractors, subcontractors, vendors and others.

That also means that, when a worker is injured on a construction site, there is a fairly good chance he or she has both a workers' compensation claim through their employer and a personal injury claim against someone else on the site.

On Christmas Eve, 2003, a delivery person brought food to a construction site in New York owned by a developer called Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership. While he was there, a sheet of plywood fell on him. His head, back and neck were injured, he was disabled from work, and he developed depression and PTSD.

He applied for and received workers' comp benefits through the restaurant he worked for. While he was disabled, his wife filed a personal injury lawsuit on his behalf against Seven Thirty One, the construction manager and a subcontractor to hold them accountable for the accident and to seek compensation for noneconomic harm such as pain and suffering, which aren't covered under New York workers' compensation law.

The problem is that in 2006, while the personal injury suit was still pending, a workers' compensation administrative law judge found that he had recovered to the extent he was no longer disabled from work, and that decision was largely upheld on appeal.

So, in 2009, the defendants in the personal injury suit asked that court to rule that the injured deliveryman's disability had ended in 2006, based on the workers' comp judge's ruling. In other words, even if the injured man had evidence that his disability continued beyond 2006, he wouldn't be able to present it because the issue had already been decided.

On Thursday, overruling its own 2011 precedent, New York's Appellate Division court ruled in favor of the development company and the other plaintiffs. It decided that the 2006 ruling by the Workers' Compensation Board judge was binding and the deliveryman could not bring it up anew in the personal injury case.

The injured deliveryman can still seek damages for noneconomic harm through the personal injury case.

Source: Thomson Reuters News & Insight, "Workers' compensation ruling binding in personal injury case," Daniel Wiessner, Feb. 14, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Pittsburgh Office
4 West Manilla Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15220

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 412-922-0800
Fax: 412-922-0801
Pittsburgh Law Office Map

Beaver County Office
2002 McMinn St.
Aliquippa, PA 15001

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 724-775-7372
Aliquippa Law Office Map

North Hills
6400 Brooktree Ct.
Wexford, PA 15090

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 724-933-0133
Wexford Law Office Map

Butler County
125 Warrendale-Bayle Rd
Warrendale, PA 15086

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 724-283-7063
Map & Directions

Monroeville
400 Penn Center Blvd.
Suite 101
Monroeville, PA 15232

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 412-261-1129
Map & Directions

Westmoreland County
101 N. Main St.
Suite 104 - A
Greensburg, PA 15601

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 724-836-7454
Greensburg Law Office Map

Washington County
2400 Ansys Dr.
Canonsburg, PA 15317

Phone: 412-353-3572
Phone: 724-743-0463
Canonsburg Law Office Map

Serving all of Western Pennsylvania Free Consultation

REVIEW US